Friday, October 15, 2010

We're all retailers now

When I proposed to write my essay on the museum as a dealership, Caleb suggested that while I could certainly prove my point there was an element of the 'so what' to it. In other words, it is quite obvious that this is happening already and to support his argument he pointed out that most Australian artists in this year's biennale came from two major commercial art galleries. Fair enough, so I changed my proposal.
However, as if to reinforce the point, today (Friday 15/10/10) I read an article in the Sydney Morning Herald titled "Galleries hoping that a blockbuster will be born" in which the discussion centred around "Art galleries in Sydney [hoping] to replicate the success of blockbuster shows interstate with a showcase of international art."
What poked me in the eye was a quote by the AGNSW Director Edmund Capon which referred to upcoming blockbusters by Picasso and Francis Bacon in which he said, "We are producing two products, but a lot of people would want to see both...It's like a shopping centre. A shopping centre with one shop is not attractive. A shopping centre with two shops is twice as attractive."
Reality check on Aisle 2 please.

2 comments:

  1. well, maybe it's a silly metaphor, but basically, Capon's right.

    Art exhibitions are products! there's no need to hold onto a romantic idea that they somehow sit outside that world of commerce - blockbuster shows would not exist if they were not economically rational...

    George, I do think there is room for your expose (for want of a better word) on the symbiotic workings of the museum world and the commercial gallery dealership world. Each has something to gain from interactions with the other: the value of each increases, etc.

    If you could do a case study of a specific situation which demonstrated this (with evidence!), it could be a valuable contribution to concrete understanding of the economics of the art system.

    ReplyDelete