Sunday, August 22, 2010

location location situation

i'm glad with the fact that it seems like a lot of people were a bit peeved by the fact that, (something that Raunig commented on in the reading on the situationst international that most people seemed to choose to focus their attention on this week) there is very little work, or anything that seemed to precipitate out of all of this philosphical creeds and manifestoes and political theories.
It felt a bit like when i made esthers in year nine science: you set up this huge interconnected mad scientist set-up of beakers and volumetric flasks bubbling away on bunsen burners and connected by rubber seals and plastic tubes, spend half an hour measuring out chemicals and in the end there's this one foot condensing tube and down it trickle two or three drops of your esther and you say to yourself 'all that for this?'

i guess i just find myself a little bit frustrated or perhaps just grumps when there arent any nice pictures or illustrations to accompany the text.


"STAY YOUNG AND SHUT UP"

Putting that aside though, i tried to do a little bit more research into the situationist international to see if i could find some more examples of where there ideas actually 'precipitated' as it were. i found that in may 1968 in paris there was this huge demonstration/ revolts/ protests/'general wild cat strikes' (i think i like that last one the best) which culminated in the biggest general strike in a developed country.
ever.
I think that it's important to place the ethos of the situationist international in the context of the social tumult and general sense of upheaval at the time. If you've ever seen that horrible film 'the dreamers' or, (something with a bit more academic cred.)'La Chinoise' by Jean Luc-Godard, you'll get a sense for how exciting those days were. So i guess i'm trying to justify or to undercut my sense of frustration with this reading, by in a sense understanding where it came from.

2 comments:

  1. there was plenty of work done. i think runig got it wrong... how else did Debord manage drink himself almost to death, only to finish it off with a bullet to the heart?

    ReplyDelete
  2. i'd need to do a lot more research before i could say that they didn't make work as an art collective or as a political agitational group, but thats definitely the sense that i think that R-dog gave me.
    i think its a pretty groovy area of slippage between artist and political activist.
    i think R-dog made reference to the russian constructivists a couple of times, i think you can draw definite parallels between the two, it just always disappoints me the way that all their ardour and gusto ends up (at least with the constructivists) being not much more than a lot of hot air.

    ReplyDelete